• The New York Times Dumps Deloitte

    By • Mar 20th, 2007 • Category: Pure Content

    Funny… Even though they are a company of reporters, there was no press release in December when they told Deloitte they were fired as their auditors or when their Board approved E&Y as the new auditors. The announcement comes only now, via an SEC filing, three months later when they must add it to the proxy for the upcoming shareholders meeting.

    When does a newspaper not print, “All the news that’s fit to print?”
    When that newspaper is part of a NYSE listed public company with accounting problems!

    Although the SEC filing contains the standard statements about “no disagreements” and the one line confirmation of this from Deloitte, it looks like the NYT didn’t like getting an adverse opinion on their internal controls from Deloitte due to material weaknesses in their controls over accounting for pension liabilities.

    The New York Times Company (the “Company”) is filing this Current Report on Form 8-K/A as Amendment No. 1 to its Current Report on Form 8-K (the “Form 8-K”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) on December 20, 2006, to report that Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) has completed its audit services for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006. As disclosed in the Form 8-K, the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Audit Committee”) approved the engagement of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm commencing with the audit for the fiscal year ending December 30, 2007, subject to ratification by the Company’s stockholders.

    Item 4.01 Changes in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant.

    (a) Previous Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    On December 14, 2006, the Audit Committee notified Deloitte that it had determined to dismiss them as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, effective as of the date of the completion of the audit services for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006. The dismissal of Deloitte became effective on March 13, 2007.

    During the Company’s two fiscal years ended December 31, 2006, and through March 1, 2007, the date of Deloitte’s audit report in respect of the 2006 financial statements, there were no disagreements between the Company and Deloitte on any matter of accounting principle or practice, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure that, if not resolved to Deloitte’s satisfaction, would have caused it to make reference to the matter in conjunction with its report on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the relevant year; and there were no reportable events as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

    Deloitte’s audit reports on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and management’s assessment thereof for the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2006, did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles except that (i) the audit report of Deloitte on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 contains an adverse opinion because of the effect of a material weakness related to a deficiency in the controls over the accounting for pension and post-retirement liabilities and (ii) Deloitte’s audit report on the Company’s consolidated financial statements includes an explanatory paragraph related to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” as revised, effective December 27, 2004, FASB Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143,” effective December 25, 2005, and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans,” relating to the recognition and related disclosure provisions, effective December 31, 2006, and an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s restatement of its 2005 and 2004 consolidated financial statements.

    The Company furnished a copy of the above disclosures to Deloitte and requested that Deloitte furnish the Company a letter addressed to the Commission stating whether or not Deloitte agrees with the statements made above. A copy of such letter is filed as Exhibit 16.1 to this Form 8-K/A.”

    is
    Email this author | All posts by

    2 Responses »

    1. WHY don’t they “Print news that’s fit to print”? I expected more from a NEWS paper. I guess they figured it would be bad press…LOL…

    2. […] done a good job lately getting themselves out of trouble. And even though they’ve had their share of rejection, they’d probably claim it’s because they’re just too good. In the end, money can […]

    Leave a Reply