<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Auditor&#8217;s New Excuse &#8211; &quot;I Was Duped!&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://retheauditors.com/2007/07/14/the-auditors-new-excuse-i-was-duped/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://retheauditors.com/2007/07/14/the-auditors-new-excuse-i-was-duped/</link>
	<description>The Business of the Big 4 Audit Firms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:24:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: No Audit At All: Deloitte and Bear Stearns - Francine McKenna - Accounting Watchdog - Forbes</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2007/07/14/the-auditors-new-excuse-i-was-duped/comment-page-1/#comment-153414</link>
		<dc:creator>No Audit At All: Deloitte and Bear Stearns - Francine McKenna - Accounting Watchdog - Forbes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=372#comment-153414</guid>
		<description>[...] seems, given how frequently it occurs, it’s quite an easy thing to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seems, given how frequently it occurs, it’s quite an easy thing to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Yake</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2007/07/14/the-auditors-new-excuse-i-was-duped/comment-page-1/#comment-152099</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Yake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=372#comment-152099</guid>
		<description>I applaud the coverage you have given this important topic. Unfortunately, the events regarding this scandal differ little from many others in the past decades. Remember Enron? Will it ever stop? By now, the facts should prove that Sarbanes-Oxley was another knee-jerk reaction by Congress and passed without any hope of achieving substantive change. 

My area of specialty is the retail industry. We have documented over 200 retail business failures since the late 1980s—where the auditing firms gave a “wink” along with the audit and the end result was these businesses failed, thousands were left unemployed, and hundreds of investors were duped. Most of these retail failures had one common denominator: the inventory had been overstated to puff-up the stock value. In other words: Same circus, different clowns!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I applaud the coverage you have given this important topic. Unfortunately, the events regarding this scandal differ little from many others in the past decades. Remember Enron? Will it ever stop? By now, the facts should prove that Sarbanes-Oxley was another knee-jerk reaction by Congress and passed without any hope of achieving substantive change. </p>
<p>My area of specialty is the retail industry. We have documented over 200 retail business failures since the late 1980s—where the auditing firms gave a “wink” along with the audit and the end result was these businesses failed, thousands were left unemployed, and hundreds of investors were duped. Most of these retail failures had one common denominator: the inventory had been overstated to puff-up the stock value. In other words: Same circus, different clowns!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Top Ten Things Lawyers Should Know About Auditors</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2007/07/14/the-auditors-new-excuse-i-was-duped/comment-page-1/#comment-130372</link>
		<dc:creator>re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Top Ten Things Lawyers Should Know About Auditors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 22:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=372#comment-130372</guid>
		<description>[...] almost anything, and (d) they are very good at avoiding liability and painting themselves as “victims” when they “miss” fraudulent activity? Isn&#8217;t this what they&#8217;re being paid [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] almost anything, and (d) they are very good at avoiding liability and painting themselves as “victims” when they “miss” fraudulent activity? Isn&#8217;t this what they&#8217;re being paid [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; If I Told You I&#8217;d Have To Shoot You. Or Lose The Case. Neither Are Good.</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2007/07/14/the-auditors-new-excuse-i-was-duped/comment-page-1/#comment-129245</link>
		<dc:creator>re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; If I Told You I&#8217;d Have To Shoot You. Or Lose The Case. Neither Are Good.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=372#comment-129245</guid>
		<description>[...] their clients. It has been asserted at times with success. It’s being used more and more and more and more. But it smacks of the “have your cake and eat it too” attitude pervasive C-level [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] their clients. It has been asserted at times with success. It’s being used more and more and more and more. But it smacks of the “have your cake and eat it too” attitude pervasive C-level [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

