<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just As I Was Starting To Feel Less Nauseous&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://retheauditors.com/2007/11/09/just-as-i-was-starting-to-feel-less-nauseous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://retheauditors.com/2007/11/09/just-as-i-was-starting-to-feel-less-nauseous/</link>
	<description>The Business of the Big 4 Audit Firms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:24:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The FEI CFRI Conference&#8230;And More</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2007/11/09/just-as-i-was-starting-to-feel-less-nauseous/comment-page-1/#comment-157250</link>
		<dc:creator>re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The FEI CFRI Conference&#8230;And More</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=506#comment-157250</guid>
		<description>[...] chuckled at my cheeky question at CFRI. My follow-up to Herz and Finnegan asked about the previous bundling by the Big 4 of support for  IFRS adoption with Congressional approval of liability caps. You don&#8217;t hear that anymore, but it was recurring theme especially right after the Treasury [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] chuckled at my cheeky question at CFRI. My follow-up to Herz and Finnegan asked about the previous bundling by the Big 4 of support for  IFRS adoption with Congressional approval of liability caps. You don&#8217;t hear that anymore, but it was recurring theme especially right after the Treasury [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New York Court of Appeals Stands By Corporate Man: In Pari Delicto Prevails</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2007/11/09/just-as-i-was-starting-to-feel-less-nauseous/comment-page-1/#comment-134833</link>
		<dc:creator>re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New York Court of Appeals Stands By Corporate Man: In Pari Delicto Prevails</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=506#comment-134833</guid>
		<description>[...] The last time I heard this one – that auditors should not be held accountable to investors for their “judgment” – it was positioned as a necessity in the event the US adopted IFRS. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The last time I heard this one – that auditors should not be held accountable to investors for their “judgment” – it was positioned as a necessity in the event the US adopted IFRS. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Systemic Risk! Dominance! Momentum! Auditors In Crisis. Again.</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2007/11/09/just-as-i-was-starting-to-feel-less-nauseous/comment-page-1/#comment-133717</link>
		<dc:creator>re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Systemic Risk! Dominance! Momentum! Auditors In Crisis. Again.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 20:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=506#comment-133717</guid>
		<description>[...] The last time I heard this one &#8211; that auditors should not be held accountable to investors for their &#8220;judgment&#8221; &#8211; it was positioned as a necessity in the event the US adopted IFRS. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The last time I heard this one &#8211; that auditors should not be held accountable to investors for their &#8220;judgment&#8221; &#8211; it was positioned as a necessity in the event the US adopted IFRS. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WSJ Swallows Big 4 Public Relations</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2007/11/09/just-as-i-was-starting-to-feel-less-nauseous/comment-page-1/#comment-84304</link>
		<dc:creator>re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WSJ Swallows Big 4 Public Relations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=506#comment-84304</guid>
		<description>[...] restatements is so much due to the fact that the auditors are getting tougher. After all, they are still asking to be able to use their judgement finally instead of just ticking the boxes. They want auditor liability caps before they start using any [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] restatements is so much due to the fact that the auditors are getting tougher. After all, they are still asking to be able to use their judgement finally instead of just ticking the boxes. They want auditor liability caps before they start using any [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The GAO Report and Stoneridge &#8211; My Audacious Hope</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2007/11/09/just-as-i-was-starting-to-feel-less-nauseous/comment-page-1/#comment-81709</link>
		<dc:creator>re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The GAO Report and Stoneridge &#8211; My Audacious Hope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 05:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=506#comment-81709</guid>
		<description>[...] PCAOB is taking only small bites out of the firms, as they lack the teeth to be a true watchdog. Who is competent, objective, independent, and non-self-serving enough, with sufficient credibility and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PCAOB is taking only small bites out of the firms, as they lack the teeth to be a true watchdog. Who is competent, objective, independent, and non-self-serving enough, with sufficient credibility and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What I&#8217;d Do: Part 2 - First Focus on the Client</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2007/11/09/just-as-i-was-starting-to-feel-less-nauseous/comment-page-1/#comment-3667</link>
		<dc:creator>re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What I&#8217;d Do: Part 2 - First Focus on the Client</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=506#comment-3667</guid>
		<description>[...] How that message has been diluted! Just listen to the leadership of the Big 4.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How that message has been diluted! Just listen to the leadership of the Big 4.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Independent Accountant</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2007/11/09/just-as-i-was-starting-to-feel-less-nauseous/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Independent Accountant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 07:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=506#comment-127</guid>
		<description>An audit is by definition whatever it is a Big Four firm does.  Don&#039;t you know that?  This is an old story.  Does anyone remember the 1976 Senate report, &quot;The Accounting Establishment&quot;? 1760 pages of criticism, virtually all of which is still relevent.  What we need is to reverse the 1995 Litigation Reform Act.  The damn rating agencies want first amendment protection for their &quot;opinions&quot;, the Big Four want to be an unaccountable monopoly.  Who needs these guys?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An audit is by definition whatever it is a Big Four firm does.  Don&#8217;t you know that?  This is an old story.  Does anyone remember the 1976 Senate report, &#8220;The Accounting Establishment&#8221;? 1760 pages of criticism, virtually all of which is still relevent.  What we need is to reverse the 1995 Litigation Reform Act.  The damn rating agencies want first amendment protection for their &#8220;opinions&#8221;, the Big Four want to be an unaccountable monopoly.  Who needs these guys?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

