<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big 4 Starting Salaries &#8211; The Facts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://retheauditors.com/2008/01/31/big-4-starting-salaries-the-facts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/01/31/big-4-starting-salaries-the-facts/</link>
	<description>The Business of the Big 4 Audit Firms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:02:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sobhaan</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/01/31/big-4-starting-salaries-the-facts/comment-page-3/#comment-162774</link>
		<dc:creator>Sobhaan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 23:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=572#comment-162774</guid>
		<description>I just got an offer from Deloitte, for about $57k + $5 bonus, I tried to negotiate but it did not work, I was told that this is there best offer, I will be taking about $20k less than what I currently make as a corporate accountant, I have an MBA and I have already passed the CPA (I need the CPA hours though). I really wanted to be in public accountant so one day I could be either a partner or have my own firm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got an offer from Deloitte, for about $57k + $5 bonus, I tried to negotiate but it did not work, I was told that this is there best offer, I will be taking about $20k less than what I currently make as a corporate accountant, I have an MBA and I have already passed the CPA (I need the CPA hours though). I really wanted to be in public accountant so one day I could be either a partner or have my own firm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/01/31/big-4-starting-salaries-the-facts/comment-page-3/#comment-161796</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=572#comment-161796</guid>
		<description>Wow! is that $3-5k a month? Because over here in Malaysia we get RM 2800 a month for students with a Degree and a Professional Qualification. That is around $912 per month (with the current exchange rate). You guys are blessed. I wish I could work there someday</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! is that $3-5k a month? Because over here in Malaysia we get RM 2800 a month for students with a Degree and a Professional Qualification. That is around $912 per month (with the current exchange rate). You guys are blessed. I wish I could work there someday</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Smithgolf</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/01/31/big-4-starting-salaries-the-facts/comment-page-3/#comment-157927</link>
		<dc:creator>George Smithgolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 18:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=572#comment-157927</guid>
		<description>So, just to make sure I have this right:

E&amp;Y: $60k + $5k bonus

An undergrad is looking at $3k to $5k less on the starting salary?   The majority of hires are undergrad so it is surprising that the salary focus of this article is grad students.   Grad students, typically those with non finance undergrad degrees, usually have less finance/accounting under their belts than undergrad accounting students.   While they do get higher pay ($3k-$5k) to compensate them for the add&#039;l years of schooling/experience, they are often not worth the bump in salary.  An undergrad student (with maturity) can easily do as well, job performance wise, as a grad student.

FOR THOSE NEW STAFFERS AND SENIOR ASSOCIATES, hang in there.   Don&#039;t focus on this short term pay-back of starting salaries.   The experience gained from those first two to five years with the BIG 4 are significantly more valuable than the pay you receive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, just to make sure I have this right:</p>
<p>E&amp;Y: $60k + $5k bonus</p>
<p>An undergrad is looking at $3k to $5k less on the starting salary?   The majority of hires are undergrad so it is surprising that the salary focus of this article is grad students.   Grad students, typically those with non finance undergrad degrees, usually have less finance/accounting under their belts than undergrad accounting students.   While they do get higher pay ($3k-$5k) to compensate them for the add&#8217;l years of schooling/experience, they are often not worth the bump in salary.  An undergrad student (with maturity) can easily do as well, job performance wise, as a grad student.</p>
<p>FOR THOSE NEW STAFFERS AND SENIOR ASSOCIATES, hang in there.   Don&#8217;t focus on this short term pay-back of starting salaries.   The experience gained from those first two to five years with the BIG 4 are significantly more valuable than the pay you receive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: St. Louis Big 4</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/01/31/big-4-starting-salaries-the-facts/comment-page-3/#comment-157380</link>
		<dc:creator>St. Louis Big 4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 07:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=572#comment-157380</guid>
		<description>A Big 4 first year in St. L is making 48-52k start, 2-4k signing bonus, 5k cpa bonus if passed within 2 years, all testing and licensing materials paid or reimbursed.

Also, a retention bonus was recently passed to incent longer stays.  Bonus pays about 15k over 2-3 years if you stay from start until manager.  This bonus is payable once promoted to manager.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Big 4 first year in St. L is making 48-52k start, 2-4k signing bonus, 5k cpa bonus if passed within 2 years, all testing and licensing materials paid or reimbursed.</p>
<p>Also, a retention bonus was recently passed to incent longer stays.  Bonus pays about 15k over 2-3 years if you stay from start until manager.  This bonus is payable once promoted to manager.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People who change</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/01/31/big-4-starting-salaries-the-facts/comment-page-3/#comment-157095</link>
		<dc:creator>People who change</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 18:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=572#comment-157095</guid>
		<description>Hi, following up on the above, I thought it maybe useful for folks to have a perspective of what the BIG 4 salaries are in emerging markets like India the numbers i give below are fairly consistent across the Big 4 and have reasonably fact checked for India member firms of these international firms.

 Associate - [ INR 500,000-600,000] US$10K-12K
 Senior :     -  [800,000-950,000] (starting) US$16K-19,000]
 Manager -    [INR 1,500,000-1,650,000] starting [US$30K]

 Senior Mgr   [INR 2million-2.2 million] starting 
 Director       [ INR 3.5 million- 4.5 million] starting [US$70K] 
 Partner        [  INR 8 to 10 million] -US$200K

Enjoy where will you get such a  handy ready recknor. Needless to say all these emerging market guys having costs of living which is comporable to their counterparts in the west as cars, cellphones, fuel, TV cost the same or a lot more in emerging markets than in the US due to high VAT and custom duties and these guys have to work much longer hours getting paid so much lesser. cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, following up on the above, I thought it maybe useful for folks to have a perspective of what the BIG 4 salaries are in emerging markets like India the numbers i give below are fairly consistent across the Big 4 and have reasonably fact checked for India member firms of these international firms.</p>
<p> Associate &#8211; [ INR 500,000-600,000] US$10K-12K<br />
 Senior :     &#8211;  [800,000-950,000] (starting) US$16K-19,000]<br />
 Manager &#8211;    [INR 1,500,000-1,650,000] starting [US$30K]</p>
<p> Senior Mgr   [INR 2million-2.2 million] starting<br />
 Director       [ INR 3.5 million- 4.5 million] starting [US$70K]<br />
 Partner        [  INR 8 to 10 million] -US$200K</p>
<p>Enjoy where will you get such a  handy ready recknor. Needless to say all these emerging market guys having costs of living which is comporable to their counterparts in the west as cars, cellphones, fuel, TV cost the same or a lot more in emerging markets than in the US due to high VAT and custom duties and these guys have to work much longer hours getting paid so much lesser. cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Underwater</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/01/31/big-4-starting-salaries-the-facts/comment-page-3/#comment-155131</link>
		<dc:creator>Underwater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=572#comment-155131</guid>
		<description>@1st Year Staff

I think you actually make his point. The reason being is that the work done by 1st year staff should not actually just be stuff that can be done by a highschooler. What ends up happening is that in the complex corporate world of business and ever changing complexity of transactions, you essentially only have 2 lines of defense (the Manager and the Partner) instead of 4 (the associates, seniors, managers and Partners). Given that the individuals with the most exposure to the day to day audit  are the seniors and staff (who are performing the grunt work and interviewing the personnel), losing this line of defense can be costly to the overall quality of the audit.

As someone who had some industry experience myself before going into audit, I can say that the way I approached things was very different than my peers. Having implemented a accounting information system prior to auditing, my view of a company&#039;s control over their information system integration after an acquisition was much different than if I had never seen one actually done. 

The previous experience allows you to see the big picture much faster as well as appreciate some of the difficulties that real companies face. While I think it&#039;s unrealistic to require previous experience (given much of what is currently expected of initial staff and seniors as well as their pay), if the goal is overall audit quality, then it could only help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@1st Year Staff</p>
<p>I think you actually make his point. The reason being is that the work done by 1st year staff should not actually just be stuff that can be done by a highschooler. What ends up happening is that in the complex corporate world of business and ever changing complexity of transactions, you essentially only have 2 lines of defense (the Manager and the Partner) instead of 4 (the associates, seniors, managers and Partners). Given that the individuals with the most exposure to the day to day audit  are the seniors and staff (who are performing the grunt work and interviewing the personnel), losing this line of defense can be costly to the overall quality of the audit.</p>
<p>As someone who had some industry experience myself before going into audit, I can say that the way I approached things was very different than my peers. Having implemented a accounting information system prior to auditing, my view of a company&#8217;s control over their information system integration after an acquisition was much different than if I had never seen one actually done. </p>
<p>The previous experience allows you to see the big picture much faster as well as appreciate some of the difficulties that real companies face. While I think it&#8217;s unrealistic to require previous experience (given much of what is currently expected of initial staff and seniors as well as their pay), if the goal is overall audit quality, then it could only help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1st year staff</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/01/31/big-4-starting-salaries-the-facts/comment-page-3/#comment-154973</link>
		<dc:creator>1st year staff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 20:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=572#comment-154973</guid>
		<description>Why do entry-level auditors need &quot;decades of experience&quot; and to fully understand the industry they are reviewing?  If anything, a college degree is too much to ask of a first year auditor.  Much of the work staff and seniors do could be performed by bright high school students or outstanding middle/elementary school students.  Most of what auditors at these levels do is reformat the spreadsheets provided by the client into a clear and understandable format (read: the format used during the prior year&#039;s audit) so that the higher-ups can make effective decisions.  Having decades of experience in industry would completely overqualify you for the type of work you do as a staff.

I agree that there are plenty of things wrong with the current public accounting model, but placing an emphasis on hiring from industry instead of from college would not solve them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do entry-level auditors need &#8220;decades of experience&#8221; and to fully understand the industry they are reviewing?  If anything, a college degree is too much to ask of a first year auditor.  Much of the work staff and seniors do could be performed by bright high school students or outstanding middle/elementary school students.  Most of what auditors at these levels do is reformat the spreadsheets provided by the client into a clear and understandable format (read: the format used during the prior year&#8217;s audit) so that the higher-ups can make effective decisions.  Having decades of experience in industry would completely overqualify you for the type of work you do as a staff.</p>
<p>I agree that there are plenty of things wrong with the current public accounting model, but placing an emphasis on hiring from industry instead of from college would not solve them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Goodkind CPA</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/01/31/big-4-starting-salaries-the-facts/comment-page-3/#comment-154735</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Goodkind CPA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 17:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=572#comment-154735</guid>
		<description>In my 6th season at Arthur Andersen&#039;s NYC Financial Markets audit division, I found myself being billed to clients at over $400 an hour as an acting audit manager and taking home less than $30 an hour.  I had a degree from NYU Business, graduating 3 terms Dean&#039;s List and only exceeds ratings as an auditor and consultant.  I earned less than 1/3 of the salary of a starting lawyer, while being billed out at over 13 times my take home salary.  

Auditors should not so underpaid.  

Auditors should also not be primarily inexperienced qualified with only a recent university degree. but should be those with decades of experience who fully understand and have experienced the industries they are reviewing financially.  The big 4 should recruit from industry, not from the university.

The current system is in tremendous need of reform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my 6th season at Arthur Andersen&#8217;s NYC Financial Markets audit division, I found myself being billed to clients at over $400 an hour as an acting audit manager and taking home less than $30 an hour.  I had a degree from NYU Business, graduating 3 terms Dean&#8217;s List and only exceeds ratings as an auditor and consultant.  I earned less than 1/3 of the salary of a starting lawyer, while being billed out at over 13 times my take home salary.  </p>
<p>Auditors should not so underpaid.  </p>
<p>Auditors should also not be primarily inexperienced qualified with only a recent university degree. but should be those with decades of experience who fully understand and have experienced the industries they are reviewing financially.  The big 4 should recruit from industry, not from the university.</p>
<p>The current system is in tremendous need of reform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People who change</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/01/31/big-4-starting-salaries-the-facts/comment-page-3/#comment-147740</link>
		<dc:creator>People who change</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 17:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=572#comment-147740</guid>
		<description>In NYC a third year senior should make US$75K plus variable pay ($7500) if you are lucky. The only challenge will be you will be moving from a second tier audit firm the Recruiters at the Big 4 can often be snooty and they get a kick out of making stingy offers from folks from non Big 4 firms.. therefore you may not be offered this much..

Also, I have a phenomenal line of site of how starting salaries are determined by the BIG 4 firms in the US and currently its not a collusion game, actually most of them get their data from Tower Perrin and though i believe most of them would like to start the kids out at 50K its competition triggered by one firm which is a bit out of line forcing the others to play catch up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In NYC a third year senior should make US$75K plus variable pay ($7500) if you are lucky. The only challenge will be you will be moving from a second tier audit firm the Recruiters at the Big 4 can often be snooty and they get a kick out of making stingy offers from folks from non Big 4 firms.. therefore you may not be offered this much..</p>
<p>Also, I have a phenomenal line of site of how starting salaries are determined by the BIG 4 firms in the US and currently its not a collusion game, actually most of them get their data from Tower Perrin and though i believe most of them would like to start the kids out at 50K its competition triggered by one firm which is a bit out of line forcing the others to play catch up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Australia</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/01/31/big-4-starting-salaries-the-facts/comment-page-3/#comment-138936</link>
		<dc:creator>Australia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 04:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=572#comment-138936</guid>
		<description>Australian Big4 graduate salaries all average around $55,000 p.a. with 4 weeks paid annual leave (as required by Australian labour regulations).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Australian Big4 graduate salaries all average around $55,000 p.a. with 4 weeks paid annual leave (as required by Australian labour regulations).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

