<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Big 4 Layoffs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://retheauditors.com/2008/02/18/more-big-4-layoffs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/02/18/more-big-4-layoffs/</link>
	<description>The Business of the Big 4 Audit Firms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:02:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Francine McKenna</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/02/18/more-big-4-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-1272</link>
		<dc:creator>Francine McKenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 03:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=593#comment-1272</guid>
		<description>@9:57:00&lt;br/&gt;Can you please repost this comment on my latest post today?  It deals directly with this issue.  Thanks.  fm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@9:57:00<br />Can you please repost this comment on my latest post today?  It deals directly with this issue.  Thanks.  fm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/02/18/more-big-4-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-1271</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=593#comment-1271</guid>
		<description>I work at a large firm in the NYC area.  We have received calls from candidates we offered last year but who decided to sign with D&amp;T.  They have had the offer the received last year rescinded in September, only weeks before they were slated to begin work.  I was out recruiting at a university today and they had three students who signed with D&amp;T last year who had their offer rescinded last month.  Based on discussions today, Universities are aware and they are not pleased.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work at a large firm in the NYC area.  We have received calls from candidates we offered last year but who decided to sign with D&amp;T.  They have had the offer the received last year rescinded in September, only weeks before they were slated to begin work.  I was out recruiting at a university today and they had three students who signed with D&amp;T last year who had their offer rescinded last month.  Based on discussions today, Universities are aware and they are not pleased.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/02/18/more-big-4-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-1267</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=593#comment-1267</guid>
		<description>Deloitte Tax has not downsized tax the few years - they have actually grown it quite a bit over that time frame, both in revenues and US headcount.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deloitte Tax has not downsized tax the few years &#8211; they have actually grown it quite a bit over that time frame, both in revenues and US headcount.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/02/18/more-big-4-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-893</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=593#comment-893</guid>
		<description>Blogger James makes reference to the ailing economy as the primary driver for the Deloitte AERS layoffs - this may be a contributor; however, I believe the main reason is partner greed.  Upper management has chosen to ramp up resources within India as labor is cheaper (now one of the largest Deloitte offices).  As if the average $700-800 thousand partner salaries are not high enough, utilizing resources in India will certainly add more dollars to the bottom line, which ultimately finds its way in to the partners&#039; pockets.  Greed is the primary influence for outsourcing/layoffs - Deloitte has downsized back office and tax within the last couple of years, and AERS is now the latest victim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogger James makes reference to the ailing economy as the primary driver for the Deloitte AERS layoffs &#8211; this may be a contributor; however, I believe the main reason is partner greed.  Upper management has chosen to ramp up resources within India as labor is cheaper (now one of the largest Deloitte offices).  As if the average $700-800 thousand partner salaries are not high enough, utilizing resources in India will certainly add more dollars to the bottom line, which ultimately finds its way in to the partners&#8217; pockets.  Greed is the primary influence for outsourcing/layoffs &#8211; Deloitte has downsized back office and tax within the last couple of years, and AERS is now the latest victim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/02/18/more-big-4-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-865</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=593#comment-865</guid>
		<description>Oh, no. It is NOT just folks on the beach, and not just poor performers... it is a real mass layoff which is totally hushed for obvious reason, but why it is not covered by the press??? (except for http://www.webcpa.com/article.cfm?ARTICLEID=28993)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, no. It is NOT just folks on the beach, and not just poor performers&#8230; it is a real mass layoff which is totally hushed for obvious reason, but why it is not covered by the press??? (except for <a href="http://www.webcpa.com/article.cfm?ARTICLEID=28993)" rel="nofollow">http://www.webcpa.com/article.cfm?ARTICLEID=28993)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/02/18/more-big-4-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=593#comment-679</guid>
		<description>It is reported within the various practices of Deloitte AERS that layoffs are happening, so far mainly seniors and managers. With a downturn in the economy, there is a lack of new project hence those with poor reviews and is on the beach for a extended period of time are being axed first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is reported within the various practices of Deloitte AERS that layoffs are happening, so far mainly seniors and managers. With a downturn in the economy, there is a lack of new project hence those with poor reviews and is on the beach for a extended period of time are being axed first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francine McKenna</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/02/18/more-big-4-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-519</link>
		<dc:creator>Francine McKenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=593#comment-519</guid>
		<description>Can you please repost this on today&quot;s post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you please repost this on today&#8221;s post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/02/18/more-big-4-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=593#comment-518</guid>
		<description>There were many layoffs in February and March.  Yes people with Visas were let go.  The layoffs were shocking and at all levels.  The firm is still hiring though....  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;-Discusted Former D&amp;T employee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were many layoffs in February and March.  Yes people with Visas were let go.  The layoffs were shocking and at all levels.  The firm is still hiring though&#8230;.  </p>
<p>-Discusted Former D&#038;T employee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/02/18/more-big-4-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-461</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 04:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=593#comment-461</guid>
		<description>Why is it that accountants cannot own shares in their audit clients or have other direct or indirect interest in their audit clients, HOWEVER many large firms &quot;invest&quot; significant fee discounts (sometimes &gt;80% of fees) in their prepublic clients.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;They talk about this &quot;investment&quot;  and look for a &quot;return&quot; from the IPO, however they claim to be independent in a public IPO situation.  In some cases they even have agreements to recover the &quot;investment&quot; if the company is acquired in an M&amp;A transaction. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;With so much oversight, why is this issue not addressed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that accountants cannot own shares in their audit clients or have other direct or indirect interest in their audit clients, HOWEVER many large firms &#8220;invest&#8221; significant fee discounts (sometimes >80% of fees) in their prepublic clients.  </p>
<p>They talk about this &#8220;investment&#8221;  and look for a &#8220;return&#8221; from the IPO, however they claim to be independent in a public IPO situation.  In some cases they even have agreements to recover the &#8220;investment&#8221; if the company is acquired in an M&#038;A transaction. </p>
<p>With so much oversight, why is this issue not addressed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/02/18/more-big-4-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=593#comment-348</guid>
		<description>Add KPMG to the list. Currently laying people across the US. Time for the smaller firms to beef up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Add KPMG to the list. Currently laying people across the US. Time for the smaller firms to beef up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

