<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Follow-Up On More Big 4 Layoffs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://retheauditors.com/2008/03/06/follow-up-on-more-big-4-layoffs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/03/06/follow-up-on-more-big-4-layoffs/</link>
	<description>The Business of the Big 4 Audit Firms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:02:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; PricewaterhouseCoopers Case Is A Game Changer</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/03/06/follow-up-on-more-big-4-layoffs/comment-page-11/#comment-4135</link>
		<dc:creator>re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; PricewaterhouseCoopers Case Is A Game Changer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=611#comment-4135</guid>
		<description>[...] by the thousands of cuts and terminations taking place right now, I&#8217;m getting all kinds of reports and updates about what&#8217;s going on all over the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by the thousands of cuts and terminations taking place right now, I&#8217;m getting all kinds of reports and updates about what&#8217;s going on all over the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hey Big 4! If I Were You, Here&#8217;s What I&#8217;d Do (Instead&#8230;)</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/03/06/follow-up-on-more-big-4-layoffs/comment-page-11/#comment-3509</link>
		<dc:creator>re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hey Big 4! If I Were You, Here&#8217;s What I&#8217;d Do (Instead&#8230;)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=611#comment-3509</guid>
		<description>[...] blog posts linked to, but the thousands of comments provided by readers in particular on the posts here, here and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blog posts linked to, but the thousands of comments provided by readers in particular on the posts here, here and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fm</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/03/06/follow-up-on-more-big-4-layoffs/comment-page-10/#comment-3034</link>
		<dc:creator>fm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=611#comment-3034</guid>
		<description>To All:

As we approach the 500 comments mark, I&#039;m going to close this thread to new comments.
Until I make a new post with a summary of these comments with regard to cuts, I would suggest the following:

http://retheauditors.com/2008/01/big-4-starting-salaries-the-facts/          For salary updates.
http://retheauditors.com/2008/01/the-reality-of-working-for-the-big-4/     For pros and cons of Big 4 life
http://retheauditors.com/2008/12/music-for-chameleons-a-visitors-view-of-the-firms/     For the discussion of the partner model, becoming a partner and partner compensation
http://retheauditors.com/2008/08/update-deloitte-statement-on-layoffs/         Any updates specifically on Deloitte cuts

Thanks for al the great discussion.  I look forward to more, hopefully under better circumstances.

Francine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To All:</p>
<p>As we approach the 500 comments mark, I&#8217;m going to close this thread to new comments.<br />
Until I make a new post with a summary of these comments with regard to cuts, I would suggest the following:</p>
<p><a href="http://retheauditors.com/2008/01/big-4-starting-salaries-the-facts/" rel="nofollow">http://retheauditors.com/2008/01/big-4-starting-salaries-the-facts/</a>          For salary updates.<br />
<a href="http://retheauditors.com/2008/01/the-reality-of-working-for-the-big-4/" rel="nofollow">http://retheauditors.com/2008/01/the-reality-of-working-for-the-big-4/</a>     For pros and cons of Big 4 life<br />
<a href="http://retheauditors.com/2008/12/music-for-chameleons-a-visitors-view-of-the-firms/" rel="nofollow">http://retheauditors.com/2008/12/music-for-chameleons-a-visitors-view-of-the-firms/</a>     For the discussion of the partner model, becoming a partner and partner compensation<br />
<a href="http://retheauditors.com/2008/08/update-deloitte-statement-on-layoffs/" rel="nofollow">http://retheauditors.com/2008/08/update-deloitte-statement-on-layoffs/</a>         Any updates specifically on Deloitte cuts</p>
<p>Thanks for al the great discussion.  I look forward to more, hopefully under better circumstances.</p>
<p>Francine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/03/06/follow-up-on-more-big-4-layoffs/comment-page-10/#comment-3033</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=611#comment-3033</guid>
		<description>496 - Govt. gives you the same vacation plus 9-5 hours and a lot more holidays.  Also the pay isn&#039;t that much less.  

In addition, the person (493?) who argued above about your &#039;income being above 50% of all US households&#039; -- seriously man thats the weakest argument in here.  If you live in CA or NY or anywhere else that is actually a RELEVANT market your income would probably still allow you to qualify for government assistance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>496 &#8211; Govt. gives you the same vacation plus 9-5 hours and a lot more holidays.  Also the pay isn&#8217;t that much less.  </p>
<p>In addition, the person (493?) who argued above about your &#8216;income being above 50% of all US households&#8217; &#8212; seriously man thats the weakest argument in here.  If you live in CA or NY or anywhere else that is actually a RELEVANT market your income would probably still allow you to qualify for government assistance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/03/06/follow-up-on-more-big-4-layoffs/comment-page-10/#comment-3032</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=611#comment-3032</guid>
		<description>@495-what good does name calling and outbursts about things you have no knowledge (someone&#039;s blaoted salary) do?  Focus on the facts, and recognize that there is a diversity of experience by people in the B4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@495-what good does name calling and outbursts about things you have no knowledge (someone&#8217;s blaoted salary) do?  Focus on the facts, and recognize that there is a diversity of experience by people in the B4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AA</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/03/06/follow-up-on-more-big-4-layoffs/comment-page-10/#comment-3031</link>
		<dc:creator>AA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=611#comment-3031</guid>
		<description>PBC - I bet you miss writing that at the top of your workpapers =)

Let&#039;s make this constructive - since I&#039;ve laid out the perks and drawbacks of life at the Big Four - expound for us in a similar way your job at your current position.  As we don&#039;t see the other side of the grass, until after we make the jump, it should prove helpful.  Do a pargraph of the pros and likewise for the con (i.e. thus keeping it objective).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PBC &#8211; I bet you miss writing that at the top of your workpapers =)</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s make this constructive &#8211; since I&#8217;ve laid out the perks and drawbacks of life at the Big Four &#8211; expound for us in a similar way your job at your current position.  As we don&#8217;t see the other side of the grass, until after we make the jump, it should prove helpful.  Do a pargraph of the pros and likewise for the con (i.e. thus keeping it objective).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/03/06/follow-up-on-more-big-4-layoffs/comment-page-10/#comment-3030</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=611#comment-3030</guid>
		<description>@495-as a result of my business travel I have been able to take vacations (after client work), visit friends/family, tack-on extra weekend visits, and see places all around the US, Europe, and Asia.  This is not from years ago.  It is as recent as yesterday.  People from my practice are in Asia or on their way in the near future.  You may not get all those things as a first year... but you will in time.  As for local ball games, Christmas parties, etc -- yes, they can and should cut back for now.  In fact, they seem to do too much of that even in good years.  It is a job afterall -- all these things are bonus and should not be expected.  But from time to time you can take advantage.  

As for &quot;getting something for yourself on the Firm&#039;s dime&quot; -- that would be illegal unless it is an approved activity with business justification and partner approval.  If it is purely a self-benefit it is taxable (by law - not cause the partners are after you).  You may take advantage of things such as the flight to a client site and adding on extra time for sightseeing while there, but otherwise it is a different form of income.

Also, where else can you get 5 weeks vacation/PTO in your first year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@495-as a result of my business travel I have been able to take vacations (after client work), visit friends/family, tack-on extra weekend visits, and see places all around the US, Europe, and Asia.  This is not from years ago.  It is as recent as yesterday.  People from my practice are in Asia or on their way in the near future.  You may not get all those things as a first year&#8230; but you will in time.  As for local ball games, Christmas parties, etc &#8212; yes, they can and should cut back for now.  In fact, they seem to do too much of that even in good years.  It is a job afterall &#8212; all these things are bonus and should not be expected.  But from time to time you can take advantage.  </p>
<p>As for &#8220;getting something for yourself on the Firm&#8217;s dime&#8221; &#8212; that would be illegal unless it is an approved activity with business justification and partner approval.  If it is purely a self-benefit it is taxable (by law &#8211; not cause the partners are after you).  You may take advantage of things such as the flight to a client site and adding on extra time for sightseeing while there, but otherwise it is a different form of income.</p>
<p>Also, where else can you get 5 weeks vacation/PTO in your first year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PassByCMAS</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/03/06/follow-up-on-more-big-4-layoffs/comment-page-10/#comment-3028</link>
		<dc:creator>PassByCMAS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=611#comment-3028</guid>
		<description>Ugh. 493... I have no words for you. Enjoy the kool-aid, buddy. From the outside looking in, 493&#039;s arguments seem totally reasonable. Once you sign on that Big Four line, don&#039;t expect the ballparks and nice hotels. Expect &quot;we&#039;re watching your every expense and you are gone in two seconds if you try to get anything nice for yourself on the Firm&#039;s dime.&quot; Times have changed. Maybe 493&#039;s post was true 4-5 years ago. It&#039;s not true anymore. And 493 is going to be fired soon anyway, since his bloated salary (thanks to the good times earlier this decade) is going to look a lot worse than people 3-4 years into it who have been getting crap for raises.

Reality, people. That&#039;s what we&#039;re here for. Quit the freaking kool-aid dance. I swear...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh. 493&#8230; I have no words for you. Enjoy the kool-aid, buddy. From the outside looking in, 493&#8217;s arguments seem totally reasonable. Once you sign on that Big Four line, don&#8217;t expect the ballparks and nice hotels. Expect &#8220;we&#8217;re watching your every expense and you are gone in two seconds if you try to get anything nice for yourself on the Firm&#8217;s dime.&#8221; Times have changed. Maybe 493&#8217;s post was true 4-5 years ago. It&#8217;s not true anymore. And 493 is going to be fired soon anyway, since his bloated salary (thanks to the good times earlier this decade) is going to look a lot worse than people 3-4 years into it who have been getting crap for raises.</p>
<p>Reality, people. That&#8217;s what we&#8217;re here for. Quit the freaking kool-aid dance. I swear&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tenacious Truman</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/03/06/follow-up-on-more-big-4-layoffs/comment-page-10/#comment-3026</link>
		<dc:creator>Tenacious Truman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=611#comment-3026</guid>
		<description>@ 492, you posted:

&quot;For example, layoffs in advisory were not utilization based (the discussions I was aware of were more about long term potential, attitude, quality of work, skillset, etc)&quot;

That may have been true at the most recent mid-year touchpoint sessions.  In fact, that&#039;s been true of every mid-year session I ever attended.  However, it is emphatically not the case regarding prior rounds of layoffs, in which a certain number of heads were identified by national leadership based almost entirely on actual YTD utilization numbers.  Folks with millions in the pipeline were targeted; one Director who just sold a $3.5 million engagement but hadn&#039;t actually started working on it was laid-off.  Those attributes you mentioned had nothing, but nothing to do with the layoff decision ... and the local partners had little if any input.

Of course I can&#039;t speak for all firms, just the one I was with until late last year.  But I was in an Advisory practice and I know whereof I speak.  (By the way, I left on my own but I was aware of how close to the axe I came in the prior rounds.  Knowing how vulnerable I was helped hasten my exit.)

-- Tenacious T.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 492, you posted:</p>
<p>&#8220;For example, layoffs in advisory were not utilization based (the discussions I was aware of were more about long term potential, attitude, quality of work, skillset, etc)&#8221;</p>
<p>That may have been true at the most recent mid-year touchpoint sessions.  In fact, that&#8217;s been true of every mid-year session I ever attended.  However, it is emphatically not the case regarding prior rounds of layoffs, in which a certain number of heads were identified by national leadership based almost entirely on actual YTD utilization numbers.  Folks with millions in the pipeline were targeted; one Director who just sold a $3.5 million engagement but hadn&#8217;t actually started working on it was laid-off.  Those attributes you mentioned had nothing, but nothing to do with the layoff decision &#8230; and the local partners had little if any input.</p>
<p>Of course I can&#8217;t speak for all firms, just the one I was with until late last year.  But I was in an Advisory practice and I know whereof I speak.  (By the way, I left on my own but I was aware of how close to the axe I came in the prior rounds.  Knowing how vulnerable I was helped hasten my exit.)</p>
<p>&#8211; Tenacious T.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AA</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/03/06/follow-up-on-more-big-4-layoffs/comment-page-10/#comment-3025</link>
		<dc:creator>AA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=611#comment-3025</guid>
		<description>To the new hires - I would agree with 492.  Even if you get an offer letter, and it doesn&#039;t have a salary, what more viable option do you have?  I&#039;m currently a manager at one of the Big Four and I can assure you - you won&#039;t be given the breadth or responsibilites that they can provide.  At 22 yrs old you&#039;ll have a company credit card flying around the country, staying in nice hotels, eating out at dinners, seeing ballgames/shows with your colleagues.  By 23-25 you&#039;ll be given the responsibility to manage interns and other staff and aid in their developments.  Often, by 25, you&#039;re often meeting with SVP&#039;s, controllers, CFO&#039;s and being their point person in the filed.  Working in industry won&#039;t even avail yourselves of that direct entrance to the &quot;C&quot; suite at your clients.  You&#039;ll get more CPE than you can imagine, will constanly be listening on webcasts on the latest accounting guidance and will be at the forefront of your industry.  

But, to whom much is given, much is required.  You&#039;ll be expected to work 55 hrs from Jan 1- March 31 (at a miniumum).  You&#039;ll be expected to work weekends around every quater close/year end.  You may not get to do those ski vacations in Jan/Feb but have to opt for the later March sessions.  The work at the onset of your career might not be as glamorous or forensic as you envisioned, but part of learning and truly managing is knowing how to do the grunt work.  You have no idea how many times document services has missed a deadline and I&#039;ve been forced to rush to Kinkos, finish last minute jobs when the staff has gone.  In the end, our only real dealiverable is either an opinion or normally an Excel/PPT/Word deliverable.  Mastering everything from tracking changes in Word, Pivot Tables in Excel and formatting quality PPT presentations will help you quickly distinguish yourself.

When you being your first day at a Big Four, keep in mind your starting salary will be higher than the &quot;MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME&quot; in the entire US.  In this culture of greed, many compare our salaries to that of ibankers, private equity or hedge fund guys.  Of course, they make a ton more.  But compare yourself to an AP clerk, a nonprofit accountant or a mid level CPA firm.  At 22 when you start, you&#039;ll be making more than 50% of households in the entire US.  And you&#039;ve still got 30-40 more years to go.  Think of the opportunities.  Think of your potential.    But never compare your net worth with your self worth.

Sign on that Big Four line...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the new hires &#8211; I would agree with 492.  Even if you get an offer letter, and it doesn&#8217;t have a salary, what more viable option do you have?  I&#8217;m currently a manager at one of the Big Four and I can assure you &#8211; you won&#8217;t be given the breadth or responsibilites that they can provide.  At 22 yrs old you&#8217;ll have a company credit card flying around the country, staying in nice hotels, eating out at dinners, seeing ballgames/shows with your colleagues.  By 23-25 you&#8217;ll be given the responsibility to manage interns and other staff and aid in their developments.  Often, by 25, you&#8217;re often meeting with SVP&#8217;s, controllers, CFO&#8217;s and being their point person in the filed.  Working in industry won&#8217;t even avail yourselves of that direct entrance to the &#8220;C&#8221; suite at your clients.  You&#8217;ll get more CPE than you can imagine, will constanly be listening on webcasts on the latest accounting guidance and will be at the forefront of your industry.  </p>
<p>But, to whom much is given, much is required.  You&#8217;ll be expected to work 55 hrs from Jan 1- March 31 (at a miniumum).  You&#8217;ll be expected to work weekends around every quater close/year end.  You may not get to do those ski vacations in Jan/Feb but have to opt for the later March sessions.  The work at the onset of your career might not be as glamorous or forensic as you envisioned, but part of learning and truly managing is knowing how to do the grunt work.  You have no idea how many times document services has missed a deadline and I&#8217;ve been forced to rush to Kinkos, finish last minute jobs when the staff has gone.  In the end, our only real dealiverable is either an opinion or normally an Excel/PPT/Word deliverable.  Mastering everything from tracking changes in Word, Pivot Tables in Excel and formatting quality PPT presentations will help you quickly distinguish yourself.</p>
<p>When you being your first day at a Big Four, keep in mind your starting salary will be higher than the &#8220;MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME&#8221; in the entire US.  In this culture of greed, many compare our salaries to that of ibankers, private equity or hedge fund guys.  Of course, they make a ton more.  But compare yourself to an AP clerk, a nonprofit accountant or a mid level CPA firm.  At 22 when you start, you&#8217;ll be making more than 50% of households in the entire US.  And you&#8217;ve still got 30-40 more years to go.  Think of the opportunities.  Think of your potential.    But never compare your net worth with your self worth.</p>
<p>Sign on that Big Four line&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

