<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bear Stearns &#8211; Sometimes Losing A Client Is A Good Thing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://retheauditors.com/2008/03/17/bear-stearns-sometimes-losing-a-client-is-a-good-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/03/17/bear-stearns-sometimes-losing-a-client-is-a-good-thing/</link>
	<description>The Business of the Big 4 Audit Firms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 20:37:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/03/17/bear-stearns-sometimes-losing-a-client-is-a-good-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=619#comment-445</guid>
		<description>There are no more deals to be made regarding BSC. $2 was paid to keep the deal from bankruptcy which forces all of BSC&#039;s off balance sheet shenanigans out in the open. It&#039;s a last ditch effort to save the other banks and IB&#039;s from the same fate. It won&#039;t work. BSC has 3 or 4 clones out there in the same situation. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Regarding the Fed opening the window. The Fed has opened every window, door, doggy-door and vent in the entire house. Liquidity is not the issue, it&#039;s trust.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;bsmup</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are no more deals to be made regarding BSC. $2 was paid to keep the deal from bankruptcy which forces all of BSC&#8217;s off balance sheet shenanigans out in the open. It&#8217;s a last ditch effort to save the other banks and IB&#8217;s from the same fate. It won&#8217;t work. BSC has 3 or 4 clones out there in the same situation. </p>
<p>Regarding the Fed opening the window. The Fed has opened every window, door, doggy-door and vent in the entire house. Liquidity is not the issue, it&#8217;s trust.</p>
<p>bsmup</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/03/17/bear-stearns-sometimes-losing-a-client-is-a-good-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 07:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=619#comment-441</guid>
		<description>I think the Bear Stearns deal gets totally reworked.  And, now that the Fed has opened the window, the only issue that probably matters now is the value of the dollar.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Certainly the BSC lawsuits are already flying around.  The question is whether bad accounting, bad decisions, or real events caused the meltdown at BSC.  Seems to me that the BSC business model was highly speculative and leveraged (30 to 1 on equity) and relied on the confidence level of counterparties.  Unless there is something horribly wrong in the 10-K or a fraud is detected, I don&#039;t see much auditor exposure.  But I do see a lot of lawyers getting involved in this mess, and the audit firms will be producing mass quantities of documents for years to come.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Final Four Guy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Bear Stearns deal gets totally reworked.  And, now that the Fed has opened the window, the only issue that probably matters now is the value of the dollar.  </p>
<p>Certainly the BSC lawsuits are already flying around.  The question is whether bad accounting, bad decisions, or real events caused the meltdown at BSC.  Seems to me that the BSC business model was highly speculative and leveraged (30 to 1 on equity) and relied on the confidence level of counterparties.  Unless there is something horribly wrong in the 10-K or a fraud is detected, I don&#8217;t see much auditor exposure.  But I do see a lot of lawyers getting involved in this mess, and the audit firms will be producing mass quantities of documents for years to come.</p>
<p>Final Four Guy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/03/17/bear-stearns-sometimes-losing-a-client-is-a-good-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 02:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=619#comment-426</guid>
		<description>Next question is, &quot;Who is going to buy JPM for $2 a share, and LEH and MER, etc. etc? Or better yet, is there anybody left who can?&quot; &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Stay below the FDIC limit ;)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;-bsmup</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next question is, &#8220;Who is going to buy JPM for $2 a share, and LEH and MER, etc. etc? Or better yet, is there anybody left who can?&#8221; </p>
<p>Stay below the FDIC limit <img src='http://retheauditors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>-bsmup</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
