<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PCAOB Pushes Auditing Standard 5 &#8211; How&#8217;s That Working Out For You?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://retheauditors.com/2008/05/09/pcaob-pushes-auditing-standard-5-hows-that-working-out-for-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/05/09/pcaob-pushes-auditing-standard-5-hows-that-working-out-for-you/</link>
	<description>The Business of the Big 4 Audit Firms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:24:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Auditing Standard 5: How Now, Brown Cow?</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/05/09/pcaob-pushes-auditing-standard-5-hows-that-working-out-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-70067</link>
		<dc:creator>re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Auditing Standard 5: How Now, Brown Cow?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 18:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=692#comment-70067</guid>
		<description>[...] by the eight largest domestic registered audit firms in 2007 and 2008. In the Spring of 2008, the SEC sent their dog, the PCAOB, to hunt firms who were not implementing Auditing Standard 5 in their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by the eight largest domestic registered audit firms in 2007 and 2008. In the Spring of 2008, the SEC sent their dog, the PCAOB, to hunt firms who were not implementing Auditing Standard 5 in their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; @Going_Concern - Making Money The Old Fashioned Way: Exploiting IFRS Mandates</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/05/09/pcaob-pushes-auditing-standard-5-hows-that-working-out-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-20948</link>
		<dc:creator>re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; @Going_Concern - Making Money The Old Fashioned Way: Exploiting IFRS Mandates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 21:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=692#comment-20948</guid>
		<description>[...] a complete stop when Auditing Standard 5 was passed in early 2007 and hit a full stop when the SEC started pushing AS5 via the PCAOB in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a complete stop when Auditing Standard 5 was passed in early 2007 and hit a full stop when the SEC started pushing AS5 via the PCAOB in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How Satyam Supported PwC&#8217;s Schizophrenic Strategy To Reenter The Systems Integration Business</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/05/09/pcaob-pushes-auditing-standard-5-hows-that-working-out-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-5226</link>
		<dc:creator>re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How Satyam Supported PwC&#8217;s Schizophrenic Strategy To Reenter The Systems Integration Business</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 04:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=692#comment-5226</guid>
		<description>[...] decision to go back big was made, primarily because of the pressure on Sarbanes-Oxley fees after Auditing Standard 5 was enacted, PwC had to find a way around their own weakness in technology leadership, lack of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] decision to go back big was made, primarily because of the pressure on Sarbanes-Oxley fees after Auditing Standard 5 was enacted, PwC had to find a way around their own weakness in technology leadership, lack of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francine McKenna</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/05/09/pcaob-pushes-auditing-standard-5-hows-that-working-out-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator>Francine McKenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 23:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=692#comment-563</guid>
		<description>@Anonymous  Well, given that AS5 integrates the opinions into one, it makes it a little more difficult.  Which was the gist of my question to Cox at the forum a few weeks ago.  But why don&#039;t you give me some examples of the significant deficiencies and material weaknesses your clients have and I will try to explain my position in a new post using those examples.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anonymous  Well, given that AS5 integrates the opinions into one, it makes it a little more difficult.  Which was the gist of my question to Cox at the forum a few weeks ago.  But why don&#8217;t you give me some examples of the significant deficiencies and material weaknesses your clients have and I will try to explain my position in a new post using those examples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2008/05/09/pcaob-pushes-auditing-standard-5-hows-that-working-out-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 20:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=692#comment-562</guid>
		<description>Love the blog.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;At some point, I would like you to summarize why you think that you can&#039;t give a clean opinion on the financial statements without giving an opinion that the internal control process is effective.  I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve ever had a client that didn&#039;t have significant deficiencies or material weaknesses, but I&#039;ve always thought the financial statements with materially correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the blog.</p>
<p>At some point, I would like you to summarize why you think that you can&#8217;t give a clean opinion on the financial statements without giving an opinion that the internal control process is effective.  I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve ever had a client that didn&#8217;t have significant deficiencies or material weaknesses, but I&#8217;ve always thought the financial statements with materially correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

