<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is a Big 4 Firm Buying BearingPoint?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://retheauditors.com/2009/02/04/is-a-big-4-firm-buying-bearingpoint-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://retheauditors.com/2009/02/04/is-a-big-4-firm-buying-bearingpoint-2/</link>
	<description>The Business of the Big 4 Audit Firms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 01:48:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2009/02/04/is-a-big-4-firm-buying-bearingpoint-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3071</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=877#comment-3071</guid>
		<description>Any idea what part of CS will be picked by PWC ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any idea what part of CS will be picked by PWC ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fxpartrocks</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2009/02/04/is-a-big-4-firm-buying-bearingpoint-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3056</link>
		<dc:creator>Fxpartrocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=877#comment-3056</guid>
		<description>The buzz is that Deloitte is Purchasing Public Service division of Bearing Point for $350m &amp; PWC is Purchasing
Japan Financial Service division of Bearing Point for $25m &amp; already
there are proposals/Negotiations to Sell of Europe, Latin America
divisions as reported in  this website

http://www.ad-hoc-news.de/bearingpoint-reaches-agreement-to-sell-key-business-unit--/de/Unternehmensnachrichten/20124824

http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090323006350&amp;newsLang=en

http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC:BGPTQ - Bearing point Stock price will start soaring upside based on the announcement I believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The buzz is that Deloitte is Purchasing Public Service division of Bearing Point for $350m &amp; PWC is Purchasing<br />
Japan Financial Service division of Bearing Point for $25m &amp; already<br />
there are proposals/Negotiations to Sell of Europe, Latin America<br />
divisions as reported in  this website</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ad-hoc-news.de/bearingpoint-reaches-agreement-to-sell-key-business-unit--/de/Unternehmensnachrichten/20124824" rel="nofollow">http://www.ad-hoc-news.de/bearingpoint-reaches-agreement-to-sell-key-business-unit&#8211;/de/Unternehmensnachrichten/20124824</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090323006350&amp;newsLang=en" rel="nofollow">http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090323006350&amp;newsLang=en</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC:BGPTQ" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC:BGPTQ</a> &#8211; Bearing point Stock price will start soaring upside based on the announcement I believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2009/02/04/is-a-big-4-firm-buying-bearingpoint-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3054</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 07:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=877#comment-3054</guid>
		<description>Seems like 2 of the big 4 are acquiring the portions of the business.

Consulting firm BearingPoint Inc (BGPTQ.OB) said it agreed to sell a large portion of its public services unit to Deloitte [DLTE.UL] for $350 million.

The company, which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy last month, said it also signed a non-binding letter of intent to sell a substantial part of its North American Commercial Services business to PricewaterhouseCoopers [PWC.UL] for $25 million.

PwC&#039;s Japanese unit is also in negotiations to buy BearingPoint&#039;s consulting business in Japan.

Separately, BearingPoint is in the late stage of discussions with local companies interested in acquiring its European and Latin American practices, the company said in a statement on Monday.

AlixPartners and Greenhill &amp; Co are acting as financial advisers to McLean, Virginia-based BearingPoint. (Reporting by Elinor Comlay, Editing by Ian Geoghegan)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like 2 of the big 4 are acquiring the portions of the business.</p>
<p>Consulting firm BearingPoint Inc (BGPTQ.OB) said it agreed to sell a large portion of its public services unit to Deloitte [DLTE.UL] for $350 million.</p>
<p>The company, which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy last month, said it also signed a non-binding letter of intent to sell a substantial part of its North American Commercial Services business to PricewaterhouseCoopers [PWC.UL] for $25 million.</p>
<p>PwC&#8217;s Japanese unit is also in negotiations to buy BearingPoint&#8217;s consulting business in Japan.</p>
<p>Separately, BearingPoint is in the late stage of discussions with local companies interested in acquiring its European and Latin American practices, the company said in a statement on Monday.</p>
<p>AlixPartners and Greenhill &amp; Co are acting as financial advisers to McLean, Virginia-based BearingPoint. (Reporting by Elinor Comlay, Editing by Ian Geoghegan)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2009/02/04/is-a-big-4-firm-buying-bearingpoint-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3044</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=877#comment-3044</guid>
		<description>They have made it official....just sent this out to everyone about 15 minutes ago.

Economic downturns often present attractive opportunities to strengthen a business and to sprint ahead of the competition.  In fact, we’re in front of one right now….one that could -- if it comes to fruition -- help us advance our PwC strategy and position us to emerge from this downturn stronger than we went in.

Yesterday, we reached an agreement in principle and signed a non-binding letter of intent with BearingPoint and its secured lenders to acquire selected U.S. contracts, assets and key employees of their Financial Services and Commercial Services practices.  We expect to receive contracts with a $200 million revenue stream.  At the same time, PwC Japan has reached an agreement in principle to acquire BearingPoint&#039;s entire Japanese consulting practice, with a $175 million revenue stream.

This transaction, if it closes successfully, represents one more step among many that collectively advance our strategic agenda -- namely our commitment to help clients create and sustain lasting change.  In short, we expect to strengthen our credentials to help our clients successfully undertake large-scale business transformation projects by expanding our strength in areas such as strategy, planning, operations and technology -- particularly with respect to SAP and Oracle expertise.  While we are not getting back into the large-scale IT implementation business, those IT credentials are essential, in some cases, for PwC to advise our clients on their successful undertaking of large-scale business transformation projects.  In addition to gaining new talent, top-tier clients and a broad new portfolio of contracts, we are also acquiring certain intellectual property, including proven methodologies, templates and thought leadership that will help our overall Advisory business.

We emphasize that this is just a bid at this point -- not a completed transaction.  And there’s no guarantee that our bid will be awarded.  In fact, in many respects, the process is just beginning.

Highlights of the process ahead
The transaction is subject to execution of a definitive asset purchase agreement and Bankruptcy Court approval.  It is anticipated that, consistent with normal bankruptcy procedures and prior to approval of the definitive agreement by the Bankruptcy Court, the Court will require the initiation of a process to market the business to third parties.  BearingPoint will support our bid during this process based on our agreement in principle. During this phase, however, other bids may emerge.  The final decision will be made by the Court based on the highest and best offer.  As you can see, there are a number of procedural thresholds needed to close this transaction and this process is expected to take several weeks. 

Why this makes sense for all of us
So, what exactly are we seeking to acquire?  Why are we are pursuing this transaction in this economic climate?  What, precisely, would the impact be on your work, your job and your opportunities here at PwC?  Again, it’s still early in the process, but since it’s natural to feel some anxiety about any type of change when the economy is in difficult straits, let’s speak to these questions directly.

Advancing Advisory’s ability to help clients create and sustain change.  Here’s what we’re seeking to acquire: key contracts and new clients -- primarily in energy, utilities, insurance, pharmaceuticals, and life sciences -- along with key people and certain intellectual property critical to meet these new contractual obligations.  Helping clients “anticipate, create and manage change&quot; is the mission that drives our entire Advisory consulting practice.  If we close this transaction, we gain valuable assets and an exceptional range of expertise central to this mission.
Emerging from the downturn stronger than we went in requires savvy and opportunistic investments.  As we have said before, we are in difficult times and are feeling the impact of the economic headwinds on our business.  So it is critical that we continue to be judicious with costs, cautious about our compensation policies, and focused on delivering the PwC Experience to our clients.  It is also critical to continue investing in our people, looking ahead and making the right long-term decisions for the Firm.  This transaction allows us to address each one of these priorities.  How?  Because, informed by our due diligence findings, the bid we are presenting is only for the assets that are directly aligned with our strategy, valued at what we believe is a fair economic price.  In other words, if we close this transaction, it will be on our own terms -- strategic, financial and economic.
This opportunity is about acquiring complementary new talents.  As with prior Advisory acquisitions in 2008 (Entology, NDS), this transaction is overwhelmingly about acquiring new talent, capabilities, contracts and client relationships that specifically advance and enhance our Advisory and Firm strategy.  We view the key people and talents we may be acquiring as strategically complementary to the goals we are all working to achieve.  And with greater bench strength in key areas -- such as strategy, planning, operations and technology -- we can strengthen the PwC Experience for our clients and expand opportunities for ourselves, not just now but later, when markets come surging back. 

Undoubtedly, you will have many additional questions.  We ask that you be patient with the process we must go through to bring this to what we hope will be a successful conclusion.  As we mentioned above, since the Bankruptcy Court must go through the process of marketing the business to third parties, you may see our competitors or other organizations bidding for the same assets.  While we await the next steps, we hope that you are enthusiastic about what this transaction will bring to our clients and our Firm alike.  We will continue to provide you with updates as substantive events unfold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have made it official&#8230;.just sent this out to everyone about 15 minutes ago.</p>
<p>Economic downturns often present attractive opportunities to strengthen a business and to sprint ahead of the competition.  In fact, we’re in front of one right now….one that could &#8212; if it comes to fruition &#8212; help us advance our PwC strategy and position us to emerge from this downturn stronger than we went in.</p>
<p>Yesterday, we reached an agreement in principle and signed a non-binding letter of intent with BearingPoint and its secured lenders to acquire selected U.S. contracts, assets and key employees of their Financial Services and Commercial Services practices.  We expect to receive contracts with a $200 million revenue stream.  At the same time, PwC Japan has reached an agreement in principle to acquire BearingPoint&#8217;s entire Japanese consulting practice, with a $175 million revenue stream.</p>
<p>This transaction, if it closes successfully, represents one more step among many that collectively advance our strategic agenda &#8212; namely our commitment to help clients create and sustain lasting change.  In short, we expect to strengthen our credentials to help our clients successfully undertake large-scale business transformation projects by expanding our strength in areas such as strategy, planning, operations and technology &#8212; particularly with respect to SAP and Oracle expertise.  While we are not getting back into the large-scale IT implementation business, those IT credentials are essential, in some cases, for PwC to advise our clients on their successful undertaking of large-scale business transformation projects.  In addition to gaining new talent, top-tier clients and a broad new portfolio of contracts, we are also acquiring certain intellectual property, including proven methodologies, templates and thought leadership that will help our overall Advisory business.</p>
<p>We emphasize that this is just a bid at this point &#8212; not a completed transaction.  And there’s no guarantee that our bid will be awarded.  In fact, in many respects, the process is just beginning.</p>
<p>Highlights of the process ahead<br />
The transaction is subject to execution of a definitive asset purchase agreement and Bankruptcy Court approval.  It is anticipated that, consistent with normal bankruptcy procedures and prior to approval of the definitive agreement by the Bankruptcy Court, the Court will require the initiation of a process to market the business to third parties.  BearingPoint will support our bid during this process based on our agreement in principle. During this phase, however, other bids may emerge.  The final decision will be made by the Court based on the highest and best offer.  As you can see, there are a number of procedural thresholds needed to close this transaction and this process is expected to take several weeks. </p>
<p>Why this makes sense for all of us<br />
So, what exactly are we seeking to acquire?  Why are we are pursuing this transaction in this economic climate?  What, precisely, would the impact be on your work, your job and your opportunities here at PwC?  Again, it’s still early in the process, but since it’s natural to feel some anxiety about any type of change when the economy is in difficult straits, let’s speak to these questions directly.</p>
<p>Advancing Advisory’s ability to help clients create and sustain change.  Here’s what we’re seeking to acquire: key contracts and new clients &#8212; primarily in energy, utilities, insurance, pharmaceuticals, and life sciences &#8212; along with key people and certain intellectual property critical to meet these new contractual obligations.  Helping clients “anticipate, create and manage change&#8221; is the mission that drives our entire Advisory consulting practice.  If we close this transaction, we gain valuable assets and an exceptional range of expertise central to this mission.<br />
Emerging from the downturn stronger than we went in requires savvy and opportunistic investments.  As we have said before, we are in difficult times and are feeling the impact of the economic headwinds on our business.  So it is critical that we continue to be judicious with costs, cautious about our compensation policies, and focused on delivering the PwC Experience to our clients.  It is also critical to continue investing in our people, looking ahead and making the right long-term decisions for the Firm.  This transaction allows us to address each one of these priorities.  How?  Because, informed by our due diligence findings, the bid we are presenting is only for the assets that are directly aligned with our strategy, valued at what we believe is a fair economic price.  In other words, if we close this transaction, it will be on our own terms &#8212; strategic, financial and economic.<br />
This opportunity is about acquiring complementary new talents.  As with prior Advisory acquisitions in 2008 (Entology, NDS), this transaction is overwhelmingly about acquiring new talent, capabilities, contracts and client relationships that specifically advance and enhance our Advisory and Firm strategy.  We view the key people and talents we may be acquiring as strategically complementary to the goals we are all working to achieve.  And with greater bench strength in key areas &#8212; such as strategy, planning, operations and technology &#8212; we can strengthen the PwC Experience for our clients and expand opportunities for ourselves, not just now but later, when markets come surging back. </p>
<p>Undoubtedly, you will have many additional questions.  We ask that you be patient with the process we must go through to bring this to what we hope will be a successful conclusion.  As we mentioned above, since the Bankruptcy Court must go through the process of marketing the business to third parties, you may see our competitors or other organizations bidding for the same assets.  While we await the next steps, we hope that you are enthusiastic about what this transaction will bring to our clients and our Firm alike.  We will continue to provide you with updates as substantive events unfold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2009/02/04/is-a-big-4-firm-buying-bearingpoint-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2628</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 02:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=877#comment-2628</guid>
		<description>Wow...I can&#039;t believe I just discovered your blog. This is very insightful to say the least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;I can&#8217;t believe I just discovered your blog. This is very insightful to say the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irregular Enterprise mobile edition</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2009/02/04/is-a-big-4-firm-buying-bearingpoint-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2068</link>
		<dc:creator>Irregular Enterprise mobile edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=877#comment-2068</guid>
		<description>[...] have been well known in the consulting industry. Earlier this month my Big 4 governance colleague Francine McKenna predicted that unless it was bought quickly, there seemed to be no hope for the company. The more substantive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have been well known in the consulting industry. Earlier this month my Big 4 governance colleague Francine McKenna predicted that unless it was bought quickly, there seemed to be no hope for the company. The more substantive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Flores</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2009/02/04/is-a-big-4-firm-buying-bearingpoint-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2067</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Flores</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=877#comment-2067</guid>
		<description>Unlike Anon above, I do not think the COI problems presented by an acquisition are &quot;greatly exaggerated&quot;.  Much of BearingPoint&#039;s PS work is comprised of longer-term contracts, ones that would be unlikely to be wrapped up within 90 days.  And Federal Services is (or was) a group within Public Services when last I worked at BE.  I&#039;m also not sure if there would be any FAR implications with shopping the contracts around to competitors of BE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlike Anon above, I do not think the COI problems presented by an acquisition are &#8220;greatly exaggerated&#8221;.  Much of BearingPoint&#8217;s PS work is comprised of longer-term contracts, ones that would be unlikely to be wrapped up within 90 days.  And Federal Services is (or was) a group within Public Services when last I worked at BE.  I&#8217;m also not sure if there would be any FAR implications with shopping the contracts around to competitors of BE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2009/02/04/is-a-big-4-firm-buying-bearingpoint-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2027</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=877#comment-2027</guid>
		<description>In general, I would agree that BearingPoint represents a huge risk to any suitor given the overwhelming debt and current opportunity for refinancing (slim to none).  However, let me make two points that do not seem to be given proper consideration.  If an organization the size of PwC acquired BearingPoint, they would be able to service the debt internally without the requirement to refinance the debt.  Secondly, with a credit profile such as PwC, they actually could refinance the debt.  The underlying contracts (beyond just SI work) hold considerable value and the customer relationships remain solid.  The idea that PwC would have to &quot;give up&quot; 1/2 to 2/3 of the contracts due to a conflict of interest is simply preposterous.  First off, there would be, on average 1/4 of BearingPoint clients that would be current (external) audit clients of PwC.  For those contracts, there would be a decision made as to the duration required to complete the SOW&#039;s.  Contracts that would be completed prior to the closing of the transaction (say ninety days) would be completed by BearingPoint with any warranty obligation booked as an assumed liability.  Any contracts that extend more than ninety days out would be identified and evaluated for sale to third parties (Accenture, Navigant, etc.).  While this does not give you the same return as completing the contracts internally, there would be a theoretical return on this business, such return would revert to BearingPoint (pre-acquisition).  This happens all the time.  Anyone that was with Price Waterhouse when they merged with Coopers &amp; Lybrand (or AY when they merged with Ernst &amp; Whinney) understands the drill.  Therefore, the anticipated &quot;shrinking&quot; of the business due to COI as offered by the author is greatly exaggerated.  One other point to make.  The Public Services (mislabeled Federal Services) Division has some large, very lucrative contracts with governments outside the U.S.  It would be irresponsible to overlook or undervalue these contracts.  Suffice it to say - PwC and many other consulting firms have been drooling over these contracts for years.  As for PwC waiting for bankruptcy filing/clearance, that would not happen.  The majority of clients of BearingPoint would exercise their standard right to terminate the contract in the event of bankruptcy and the firm would have little residual value.  At that point, there would most likely be an MBO by a group of key MD&#039;s to service the few remaining contracts of value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In general, I would agree that BearingPoint represents a huge risk to any suitor given the overwhelming debt and current opportunity for refinancing (slim to none).  However, let me make two points that do not seem to be given proper consideration.  If an organization the size of PwC acquired BearingPoint, they would be able to service the debt internally without the requirement to refinance the debt.  Secondly, with a credit profile such as PwC, they actually could refinance the debt.  The underlying contracts (beyond just SI work) hold considerable value and the customer relationships remain solid.  The idea that PwC would have to &quot;give up&quot; 1/2 to 2/3 of the contracts due to a conflict of interest is simply preposterous.  First off, there would be, on average 1/4 of BearingPoint clients that would be current (external) audit clients of PwC.  For those contracts, there would be a decision made as to the duration required to complete the SOW&#39;s.  Contracts that would be completed prior to the closing of the transaction (say ninety days) would be completed by BearingPoint with any warranty obligation booked as an assumed liability.  Any contracts that extend more than ninety days out would be identified and evaluated for sale to third parties (Accenture, Navigant, etc.).  While this does not give you the same return as completing the contracts internally, there would be a theoretical return on this business, such return would revert to BearingPoint (pre-acquisition).  This happens all the time.  Anyone that was with Price Waterhouse when they merged with Coopers &amp; Lybrand (or AY when they merged with Ernst &amp; Whinney) understands the drill.  Therefore, the anticipated &quot;shrinking&quot; of the business due to COI as offered by the author is greatly exaggerated.  One other point to make.  The Public Services (mislabeled Federal Services) Division has some large, very lucrative contracts with governments outside the U.S.  It would be irresponsible to overlook or undervalue these contracts.  Suffice it to say &#8211; PwC and many other consulting firms have been drooling over these contracts for years.  As for PwC waiting for bankruptcy filing/clearance, that would not happen.  The majority of clients of BearingPoint would exercise their standard right to terminate the contract in the event of bankruptcy and the firm would have little residual value.  At that point, there would most likely be an MBO by a group of key MD&#39;s to service the few remaining contracts of value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2009/02/04/is-a-big-4-firm-buying-bearingpoint-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1995</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 03:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=877#comment-1995</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know what&#039;s been happening to BP in Australia? Seems many moved to Deloitte last year and there are only 6 MD&#039;s left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know what&#8217;s been happening to BP in Australia? Seems many moved to Deloitte last year and there are only 6 MD&#8217;s left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2009/02/04/is-a-big-4-firm-buying-bearingpoint-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1985</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 12:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://76.12.174.187/?p=877#comment-1985</guid>
		<description>I van confirm that PwC is having talks with Bearingpoint. This is more than just a roumour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I van confirm that PwC is having talks with Bearingpoint. This is more than just a roumour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

