<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looking Out For Me, Myself, And I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://retheauditors.com/2009/03/15/looking-out-for-me-myself-and-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://retheauditors.com/2009/03/15/looking-out-for-me-myself-and-i/</link>
	<description>The Business of the Big 4 Audit Firms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:24:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PCAOB Auditor Identification Proposal Signals Slow But Steady Reform - Forbes</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2009/03/15/looking-out-for-me-myself-and-i/comment-page-1/#comment-155987</link>
		<dc:creator>PCAOB Auditor Identification Proposal Signals Slow But Steady Reform - Forbes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retheauditors.com/?p=1307#comment-155987</guid>
		<description>[...] wasn’t the first such instance and she won’t be the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wasn’t the first such instance and she won’t be the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schapiro's List: Choices To Be Made At The PCAOB - Forbes</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2009/03/15/looking-out-for-me-myself-and-i/comment-page-1/#comment-155864</link>
		<dc:creator>Schapiro's List: Choices To Be Made At The PCAOB - Forbes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retheauditors.com/?p=1307#comment-155864</guid>
		<description>[...] of the SEC Office of Compliance and Inspections are PwC partners. Another founding PCAOB member, Tom Ray, went back to a big job at KPMG in 2009. It&#8217;s not a stretch to say the SEC has been captured [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the SEC Office of Compliance and Inspections are PwC partners. Another founding PCAOB member, Tom Ray, went back to a big job at KPMG in 2009. It&#8217;s not a stretch to say the SEC has been captured [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Being Expedient: PwC Settles Satyam U.S. Class Action</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2009/03/15/looking-out-for-me-myself-and-i/comment-page-1/#comment-154594</link>
		<dc:creator>re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Being Expedient: PwC Settles Satyam U.S. Class Action</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 22:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retheauditors.com/?p=1307#comment-154594</guid>
		<description>[...] wasn&#8217;t the first such instance and she won&#8217;t be the last. Instead of an honorable class of career public servants, this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wasn&#8217;t the first such instance and she won&#8217;t be the last. Instead of an honorable class of career public servants, this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Auditors Say Jump&#8230; New &#8220;Appeals&#8221; Process Will Impede Timely PCAOB Inspection Reports</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2009/03/15/looking-out-for-me-myself-and-i/comment-page-1/#comment-123749</link>
		<dc:creator>re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Auditors Say Jump&#8230; New &#8220;Appeals&#8221; Process Will Impede Timely PCAOB Inspection Reports</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 20:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retheauditors.com/?p=1307#comment-123749</guid>
		<description>[...] has been living under the PCAOB inspection process for a while and can not return to his firm, Tom Ray-revolving door style. But we have to be careful that this person is not a wolf in sheep&#8217;s clothing, undermining [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has been living under the PCAOB inspection process for a while and can not return to his firm, Tom Ray-revolving door style. But we have to be careful that this person is not a wolf in sheep&#8217;s clothing, undermining [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Going Concern Audit Opinions: Why So Few Warning Flares?</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2009/03/15/looking-out-for-me-myself-and-i/comment-page-1/#comment-27551</link>
		<dc:creator>re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Going Concern Audit Opinions: Why So Few Warning Flares?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retheauditors.com/?p=1307#comment-27551</guid>
		<description>[...] From a speech to the AICPA Conference in December 2008 by former PCOAB Chief Auditor and Director of Professional Standards Tom Ray: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From a speech to the AICPA Conference in December 2008 by former PCOAB Chief Auditor and Director of Professional Standards Tom Ray: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; KPMG Has A $1 Billion New Century Problem</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2009/03/15/looking-out-for-me-myself-and-i/comment-page-1/#comment-3310</link>
		<dc:creator>re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; KPMG Has A $1 Billion New Century Problem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retheauditors.com/?p=1307#comment-3310</guid>
		<description>[...] I wrote a few days ago about former PCAOB Chief Auditor and Director of Professional Standards Tom Ray returning to his home firm, KPMG, after several years at the PCAOB.  I lamented the fact that Ray could roll back into his old firm [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I wrote a few days ago about former PCAOB Chief Auditor and Director of Professional Standards Tom Ray returning to his home firm, KPMG, after several years at the PCAOB.  I lamented the fact that Ray could roll back into his old firm [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hello Hotness</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2009/03/15/looking-out-for-me-myself-and-i/comment-page-1/#comment-3135</link>
		<dc:creator>Hello Hotness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retheauditors.com/?p=1307#comment-3135</guid>
		<description>Hello Handsome.  Someone looked good in 1973.  Did they even have color pictures back then?  My baby pictures used to be orange...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Handsome.  Someone looked good in 1973.  Did they even have color pictures back then?  My baby pictures used to be orange&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krupo</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2009/03/15/looking-out-for-me-myself-and-i/comment-page-1/#comment-2724</link>
		<dc:creator>Krupo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 03:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retheauditors.com/?p=1307#comment-2724</guid>
		<description>Wow John McL&#039;s news is huge. I know there are some certain autographs I&#039;d be keen to get ahold of now! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow John McL&#8217;s news is huge. I know there are some certain autographs I&#8217;d be keen to get ahold of now! <img src='http://retheauditors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2009/03/15/looking-out-for-me-myself-and-i/comment-page-1/#comment-2722</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 03:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retheauditors.com/?p=1307#comment-2722</guid>
		<description>@Anonymous 11:00

Most men look good when they&#039;re under 32 or so.  Later, they better have brains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anonymous 11:00</p>
<p>Most men look good when they&#8217;re under 32 or so.  Later, they better have brains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2009/03/15/looking-out-for-me-myself-and-i/comment-page-1/#comment-2721</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 03:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retheauditors.com/?p=1307#comment-2721</guid>
		<description>Nice Pic. Hank was a hottie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice Pic. Hank was a hottie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

