<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From re: The Auditors&#8217; Mailbag: A Selected Sample</title>
	<atom:link href="http://retheauditors.com/2009/10/18/from-re-the-auditors-mailbag-a-selected-sample/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://retheauditors.com/2009/10/18/from-re-the-auditors-mailbag-a-selected-sample/</link>
	<description>The Business of the Big 4 Audit Firms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:24:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: De Minimis</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2009/10/18/from-re-the-auditors-mailbag-a-selected-sample/comment-page-1/#comment-39024</link>
		<dc:creator>De Minimis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 08:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retheauditors.com/?p=3157#comment-39024</guid>
		<description>Re: The CPA exam.  I think anything goes now, and passing the exam won&#039;t help much if they&#039;ve decided to cut people.  I actually got criticism for studying when I was unassigned, and my passing of the exam was not even mentioned on the evaluation form that they gave to me the day they let me go.

Still very glad I did it, though...it&#039;s about the only positive thing I got from my Big 4 experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: The CPA exam.  I think anything goes now, and passing the exam won&#8217;t help much if they&#8217;ve decided to cut people.  I actually got criticism for studying when I was unassigned, and my passing of the exam was not even mentioned on the evaluation form that they gave to me the day they let me go.</p>
<p>Still very glad I did it, though&#8230;it&#8217;s about the only positive thing I got from my Big 4 experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2009/10/18/from-re-the-auditors-mailbag-a-selected-sample/comment-page-1/#comment-37551</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retheauditors.com/?p=3157#comment-37551</guid>
		<description>My limited experience is that hiring people with visas or sponsoring people for a visa is all about whether there is a US citizen who is willing to, available and able to do the job.  If you layoff person A and open a job req for person B -- the skill set for the job req is rarely exactly the same (some would argue that is the reason for the layoff -- to reposition and in so doing retool the staff).  So I believe it is an independent question -- if the job req has no US citizens with the proper qualifications willing and available for the position then they can go to others.  The game that is often played -- write the job req so specific that there could be no US citizen that would meet the requirements.  I believe this trick is done at all times, whether there have been layoffs or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My limited experience is that hiring people with visas or sponsoring people for a visa is all about whether there is a US citizen who is willing to, available and able to do the job.  If you layoff person A and open a job req for person B &#8212; the skill set for the job req is rarely exactly the same (some would argue that is the reason for the layoff &#8212; to reposition and in so doing retool the staff).  So I believe it is an independent question &#8212; if the job req has no US citizens with the proper qualifications willing and available for the position then they can go to others.  The game that is often played &#8212; write the job req so specific that there could be no US citizen that would meet the requirements.  I believe this trick is done at all times, whether there have been layoffs or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flycat</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2009/10/18/from-re-the-auditors-mailbag-a-selected-sample/comment-page-1/#comment-37194</link>
		<dc:creator>flycat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retheauditors.com/?p=3157#comment-37194</guid>
		<description>I think there are legal issues with supporting visas for foreign workers when you have had layoffs in the past x months.  One of the partners from my former firm approached me to try and hire someone whose visa they couldn&#039;t sponsor because they had done layoffs.  Maybe one of your other readers can confirm this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there are legal issues with supporting visas for foreign workers when you have had layoffs in the past x months.  One of the partners from my former firm approached me to try and hire someone whose visa they couldn&#8217;t sponsor because they had done layoffs.  Maybe one of your other readers can confirm this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

