<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: @Going Concern &#8220;Sarbanes-Oxley Doublespeak&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://retheauditors.com/2009/12/02/going-concern-sarbanes-oxley-doublespeak/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://retheauditors.com/2009/12/02/going-concern-sarbanes-oxley-doublespeak/</link>
	<description>The Business of the Big 4 Audit Firms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 19:19:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sarbanes-Oxley Insights: An Interview With Bob Hirth of Protiviti</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2009/12/02/going-concern-sarbanes-oxley-doublespeak/comment-page-1/#comment-85085</link>
		<dc:creator>re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sarbanes-Oxley Insights: An Interview With Bob Hirth of Protiviti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retheauditors.com/2009/12/02/going-concern-sarbanes-oxley-doublespeak/#comment-85085</guid>
		<description>[...] In the meantime, I asked Bob Hirth (San Francisco), Executive VP, Global Internal Audit Practice for Protiviti, and Scott Gracyalny (Chicago), Managing Director, Risk Technology Services a few questions about Sarbanes-Oxley and companies’ attitudes towards risk, controls, and corporate governance. fm: What are your objectives in producing this study at this time given that the PCAOB, and perhaps SOx and Section 404, are perceived by many to be threatened by the forthcoming Supreme Court decision in Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the meantime, I asked Bob Hirth (San Francisco), Executive VP, Global Internal Audit Practice for Protiviti, and Scott Gracyalny (Chicago), Managing Director, Risk Technology Services a few questions about Sarbanes-Oxley and companies’ attitudes towards risk, controls, and corporate governance. fm: What are your objectives in producing this study at this time given that the PCAOB, and perhaps SOx and Section 404, are perceived by many to be threatened by the forthcoming Supreme Court decision in Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; McKenna Quoted In Search Compliance.Com</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2009/12/02/going-concern-sarbanes-oxley-doublespeak/comment-page-1/#comment-74230</link>
		<dc:creator>re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; McKenna Quoted In Search Compliance.Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retheauditors.com/2009/12/02/going-concern-sarbanes-oxley-doublespeak/#comment-74230</guid>
		<description>[...] other recent stories discussing my position on Sarbanes-Oxley here, here, and here.       Easy AdSense by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] other recent stories discussing my position on Sarbanes-Oxley here, here, and here.       Easy AdSense by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
