<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Auditors Ever Answer To Investors For Aiding And Abetting?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://retheauditors.com/2010/06/16/will-auditors-ever-answer-to-investors-for-aiding-and-abetting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://retheauditors.com/2010/06/16/will-auditors-ever-answer-to-investors-for-aiding-and-abetting/</link>
	<description>The Business of the Big 4 Audit Firms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 01:48:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New York Court of Appeals Stands By Corporate Man: In Pari Delicto Prevails</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2010/06/16/will-auditors-ever-answer-to-investors-for-aiding-and-abetting/comment-page-1/#comment-154535</link>
		<dc:creator>re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New York Court of Appeals Stands By Corporate Man: In Pari Delicto Prevails</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 22:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retheauditors.com/?p=5032#comment-154535</guid>
		<description>[...] diluted.Civil penalties against audit firms as a whole will be severely rationed.  The private right of action against audit firms will be constrained by the PSLRA, the Stoneridge decision, obdurate judges, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] diluted.Civil penalties against audit firms as a whole will be severely rationed.  The private right of action against audit firms will be constrained by the PSLRA, the Stoneridge decision, obdurate judges, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Auditors Abandon Investors On Liability Limits - Francine McKenna - Accounting Watchdog - Forbes</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2010/06/16/will-auditors-ever-answer-to-investors-for-aiding-and-abetting/comment-page-1/#comment-154161</link>
		<dc:creator>Auditors Abandon Investors On Liability Limits - Francine McKenna - Accounting Watchdog - Forbes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retheauditors.com/?p=5032#comment-154161</guid>
		<description>[...] acts to the corporation, therefore precluding the corporation from suing a third party for aiding and abetting the fraud, means a New York audit is basically worthless if corporate officers are guilty. The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] acts to the corporation, therefore precluding the corporation from suing a third party for aiding and abetting the fraud, means a New York audit is basically worthless if corporate officers are guilty. The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forget Everyone Else: Why Aren&#8217;t Auditors Answering For Financial Crisis? - Francine McKenna - Accounting Watchdog - Forbes</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2010/06/16/will-auditors-ever-answer-to-investors-for-aiding-and-abetting/comment-page-1/#comment-152061</link>
		<dc:creator>Forget Everyone Else: Why Aren&#8217;t Auditors Answering For Financial Crisis? - Francine McKenna - Accounting Watchdog - Forbes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retheauditors.com/?p=5032#comment-152061</guid>
		<description>[...] law so it’s clear to judges, to restore the right to allege in private claims that third-parties “aided and abetted” frauds, were left out of the Dodd-Frank [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] law so it’s clear to judges, to restore the right to allege in private claims that third-parties “aided and abetted” frauds, were left out of the Dodd-Frank [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Any Other Audit Firm Vulnerable Besides Ernst &#38; Young? - Francine McKenna - Accounting Watchdog - Forbes</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2010/06/16/will-auditors-ever-answer-to-investors-for-aiding-and-abetting/comment-page-1/#comment-146214</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Any Other Audit Firm Vulnerable Besides Ernst &#38; Young? - Francine McKenna - Accounting Watchdog - Forbes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retheauditors.com/?p=5032#comment-146214</guid>
		<description>[...] courts and the laws support this immunity, for the most part.  The regulators have been active but fairly impotent to change auditors’ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] courts and the laws support this immunity, for the most part.  The regulators have been active but fairly impotent to change auditors’ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Case Against Ernst &#38; Young: NY AG Cuomo Sues EY Over Lehman</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2010/06/16/will-auditors-ever-answer-to-investors-for-aiding-and-abetting/comment-page-1/#comment-145880</link>
		<dc:creator>re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Case Against Ernst &#38; Young: NY AG Cuomo Sues EY Over Lehman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retheauditors.com/?p=5032#comment-145880</guid>
		<description>[...] the Martin Act is the law used by Cuomo to bypass all the other constraints mere mortals have in suing the Big 4 audit firms. It&#8217;s quite a powerful tool, as Eliot Spitzer showed us. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Martin Act is the law used by Cuomo to bypass all the other constraints mere mortals have in suing the Big 4 audit firms. It&#8217;s quite a powerful tool, as Eliot Spitzer showed us. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Systemic Risk! Dominance! Momentum! Auditors In Crisis. Again.</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2010/06/16/will-auditors-ever-answer-to-investors-for-aiding-and-abetting/comment-page-1/#comment-135086</link>
		<dc:creator>re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Systemic Risk! Dominance! Momentum! Auditors In Crisis. Again.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 05:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retheauditors.com/?p=5032#comment-135086</guid>
		<description>[...] diluted. Civil penalties against audit firms as a whole will be severely rationed.  The private right of action against audit firms will be constrained by the PSLRA, the Stoneridge decision, obdurate judges, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] diluted. Civil penalties against audit firms as a whole will be severely rationed.  The private right of action against audit firms will be constrained by the PSLRA, the Stoneridge decision, obdurate judges, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Top Ten Things Lawyers Should Know About Auditors</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2010/06/16/will-auditors-ever-answer-to-investors-for-aiding-and-abetting/comment-page-1/#comment-130181</link>
		<dc:creator>re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Top Ten Things Lawyers Should Know About Auditors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 09:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retheauditors.com/?p=5032#comment-130181</guid>
		<description>[...] for accounting rules that benefit their clients and laws that limit their accountability (read, “PSLRA” and the “Stoneridge” decision, (c) they use accounting rules (read, &#8220;special purpose entities,&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for accounting rules that benefit their clients and laws that limit their accountability (read, “PSLRA” and the “Stoneridge” decision, (c) they use accounting rules (read, &#8220;special purpose entities,&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Seeking An Equitable Outcome: NY State Court of Appeals To Hear In Pari Delicto Cases Re: Auditors</title>
		<link>http://retheauditors.com/2010/06/16/will-auditors-ever-answer-to-investors-for-aiding-and-abetting/comment-page-1/#comment-129770</link>
		<dc:creator>re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Seeking An Equitable Outcome: NY State Court of Appeals To Hear In Pari Delicto Cases Re: Auditors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retheauditors.com/?p=5032#comment-129770</guid>
		<description>[...] we know, the case could not be brought under federal securities laws since the PSLRA bars private actions for aiding and abetting a fraud and, Grant emphasized to me, “Congress has not yet seen fit to amend this law to give private [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we know, the case could not be brought under federal securities laws since the PSLRA bars private actions for aiding and abetting a fraud and, Grant emphasized to me, “Congress has not yet seen fit to amend this law to give private [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

